![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Past Issues | Subscribe | Advertise | myAST.org | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Important Dates
AST News
Registration Open: Cutting Edge of Transplantation 2026
Join us at CEoT 2026, a three-day meeting focused on advancing transplantation science, clinical practice, and patient outcomes. This meeting will explore the future of transplantation across all organ types, highlighting innovation, equity, and lifelong patient care. Hear from leading experts and engage in interactive breakout sessions across specialties, focusing on emerging technologies, allocation strategies, and the changing landscape of organ disease.
Board of Directors Nominations
The 2026-2027 Board of Directors nomination window is now open! The AST is currently accepting nominations for President, Treasurer, and three Councilors-at-Large. The election will begin in April 2026, and newly elected board members will begin their terms on June 22, 2026, following the AST Town Hall at the American Transplant Congress.
Renew Your AST Membership
As the 2025 AST membership year begins to close, don't forget to renew your membership and reaffirm your commitment to the AST. Renewal invoices were distributed via email and are due December 31, 2025. If you didn't receive your email, you may log in anytime to your AST member account. Don't miss out on all future AST educational, networking, advocacy, and research efforts!
On Your Mark, Get Set, GO! The 2025 Donation Derby Begins!
The Donation Derby is back — and your Community of Practice (COP) needs your support! Every gift you make helps fund your COP’s initiatives and projects and brings them one step closer to victory. Rally behind your COP, make a donation, and help them race to the top!
Updates on Efforts and Resources Related to Transplant Nephrology Training
In fall 2024, the ACGME approved the application from the joint ASN-AST Task Force to recognize transplant nephrology as an accredited subspecialty of nephrology. By supporting a broad and nationwide adoption of uniformly rigorous transplant nephrology training, ASN and AST hope to improve the quality of care provided to patients in both the pre-and post-transplant phases.
A webpage has been created to share ongoing updates and resources related to this new accreditation.
New AJT Article: Transplant Recipients Share Perspectives on Immunosuppressant Needs
Source: American Journal of Transplantation
Last year, with your support, AST conducted a national patient survey that received nearly 10,000 responses from transplant recipients. The goal: to better understand perceptions of unmet immunosuppressant needs. The findings from this important research have now been published in the American Journal of Transplantation. ABIM Board of Directors: Application Open
Source: American Board of Internal Medicine
Applicants from all backgrounds are encouraged to apply. Because ABIM strives to have representation from a cross-section of the profession bringing a broad range of perspectives, ABIM particularly welcomes applications from those with experience in rural medicine, leaders in academic medicine and physicians who are clinically active. Individual candidates are not expected to hold all of these qualities; applicants who bring strength in any area are encouraged to apply.
Upcoming Education
AST Public Policy Form
The AST developed a survey aimed at soliciting your perspectives on legislative and regulatory issues that significantly influence both patient care and professional practice. Our goal is to establish a platform for our membership to share their invaluable ideas and perspectives and actively engage with the Public Policy Committee and AST leadership. We look forward to your input as we navigate the dynamics of our ever-evolving landscape of transplant care and practice.
Key Articles in Transplantation
Steroid Withdrawal Versus Maintenance in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Transplantation: Long-Term Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort
Source: Wiley Online Library
Simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) transplants using steroid-free regimens are a frequently used immunosuppressive strategy in low immunologic risk recipients. The long-term effect on recipient outcomes remains incompletely understood.
Ideal Body Weight Ratio for Donor-to-Recipient Size Matching in Heart Transplantation
Source: Wiley Online Library
A total of 46 721 donor-recipient matches were identified. PHM demonstrated higher survival for properly sized and oversized patients compared to undersized (p < 0.01). For IPHM, survival was highest in the properly sized patients, lower in the oversized, and lowest in the undersized patients (p < 0.01). For IBW, survival was superior in properly sized group compared to undersized and oversized patients (p < 0.03). Non-linear analysis of PHM showed increased mortality risk with undersizing and decreased risk with oversizing (p < 0.01). IPHM demonstrated higher mortality risk with undersizing but no notable risk with oversizing (p < 0.01), whereas IBW showed increased risk with both undersizing and oversizing (p < 0.01).
A novel measure of spatial accessibility to transplant services predicts population-based access to liver transplant
Source: LWW Journals
Geographic variation in liver transplant access in the United States have spurred interest in spatial accessibility to care. There is currently no consensus about which measure should be used for spatial accessibility. We used 2015–2022 data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients and the National Center for Health Statistics to calculate county listing-to-death ratios (LDR) for liver transplant. We used a two-step floating catchment area approach to define a novel measure of spatial accessibility (Spatial Accessibility Ratio, SPAR). We compared this measure to other accessibility measures using generalized linear models and Vuong’s non-nested hypothesis test. Across 3,108 included counties, SPAR ranged from 0.56 to 9.98; 29% of counties and 65% of the population had a SPAR≥1 (mean or better accessibility to liver transplant). SPAR outperformed distance (p<0.001), rurality (p<0.001), and health care resource-based measures (p<0.001) in predicting population-based transplant access; SPAR remained significantly associated with LDR after adjustment for other county-level factors.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||