Elster Solutions, LLC

Public Power Daily
Monday, March 04, 2013 Past Issues | Subscribe | Printer-Friendly | Advertise | RSS
PublicPower.org | PublicPowerMedia.org | APPA Online Suppliers Guide | Public Power TV
The city of Boulder, Colo., which wants a lower carbon footprint and more renewable energy, is seriously considering forming a municipal electric utility to get those things. According to a Feb. 26 report, the effort would likely pay off, both in the near term and over 20 years. The analysis finds that, under at least some of the scenarios studied by city staff, "a local utility could operate effectively with cost savings and flexibility, creating significant advantages" compared to continuing the current arrangement with investor-owned Xcel Energy. The report goes farther, saying that Boulder could cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent and could procure half of its energy from renewable sources.

"The opportunity exists for Boulder to transition to a new sustainable, low-carbon emission society, and it is coming much faster than anyone had anticipated just a few years ago," the city said. "The growing differential between the rising costs of fossil fuels and the declining costs of renewable energy technologies is setting the stage for the emergence of a new economic paradigm for the next century. Boulder is poised to drive this process to tackle climate change, secure energy independence, and grow a sustainable 21st century economy all at the same time."

"This is a really exciting night," said Heather Bailey, executive director of energy strategy and electric utility development, at a three-hour work session and public hearing held by the Boulder City Council on Feb. 26. She cautioned, though, that the February report does not decide the question of whether the city should form a municipal electric utility. That question is for the future, she said. The study does say "yes," however, to the preliminary question of whether Boulder could create a city-owned utility and meet the goals it has set for itself if it decides to go down that path, she said.

"We believe the findings demonstrate that a municipal utility could be good for consumers, good for Boulder businesses and good for our planet," Bailey said. "We look forward to an informed conversation over the next couple of months about how best to proceed."

The City Council is scheduled to vote April 16 on whether to continue to pursue municipalization. City leaders have said they also are open to a partnership with Xcel Energy to reach their clean energy goals.

The 38-page report, Boulder's Energy Future Municipalization Exploration, which runs to 287 pages including all attachments, is posted on the city's website, under "Boulder's Energy Future."

The city has taken a slow, methodical approach to its quest for a greener energy supply. In November 2011, residents of Boulder approved two ballot measures on the city's energy future. One of those ballot questions authorized the city to explore the possibility of purchasing Xcel Energy's distribution system and forming a municipal utility, providing that customer rates would be no higher than the rates Xcel Energy is charging at the time of acquisition. The other ballot provided the funding necessary to determine the actual costs of buying Xcel’s system and starting a local utility. (See the Nov. 3, 2011 Public Power Daily.)

The November 2011 ballot measures set limiting requirements in the city charter that must be met before City Council could proceed. These included provisions related to rates, revenue sufficiency and reliability, as well as plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase renewable sources of energy.

A summer 2011 telephone survey found that Boulder voters supported creation of a city-owned electric utility by a wide margin and that residents overwhelmingly wanted a reduction in carbon emissions. Seventy-one percent of survey respondents said they supported municipalization and said they thought the city would be better than Xcel Energy at offering renewable sources of energy and at reducing carbon emissions.

In its latest study, city staff looked at six different scenarios:
1. A baseline option that keeps Xcel as the city's supplier, using current rates;
2. A phased-in approach to municipal power, using a five-year purchased power agreement with Xcel, then allowing the city to enter agreements with other suppliers;
3. A low-cost option that would have 25 percent of the mix be coal-fired power in 2017;
4. A second low-cost generation option that excludes coal;
5. A low-greenhouse-gas option based on power supply purchases; and
6. A low-greenhouse-gas option that would include investment in local energy-efficiency efforts.

One of the surprising findings is that in four of the six scenarios, the city is projected to exceed the greenhouse gas reduction goals set by the Kyoto treaty, said Jonathan Koehn, regional sustainability coordinator.  A fifth scenario met and exceeded the Kyoto goals in year five, he told the Feb. 26 City Council work session. The only scenario that failed to meet the Kyoto greenhouse gas emission goals was the "status quo" option that assumes that the city keeps Xcel Energy as its supplier (with no change in that company's power supply plans).

Even under the low-cost option, "we got a surprising amount of greenhouse gas reduction," said Koehn. "It is astounding to see how much we could reduce emissions."

The city said that under some of the options analyzed, a municipal electric utility would meet the charter metrics and have a high likelihood of being able to:

• Offer all three major customer classes (residential, commercial and industrial) lower rates than what they would pay Xcel, not just on day one, as required by the city charter, but on average over 20 years;
• Maintain or exceed current levels of system reliability and emergency response;
• Reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 50 percent from current levels and exceed the Kyoto Protocol target in year one;
• Obtain 54 percent or more of its electricity from renewable resources; and
• Create "a model public electric utility with leading-edge innovations in reliability, energy efficiency, renewable energy, related economic development and customer service."

The report also examines the impact that a variety of stranded cost and acquisition cost rulings could have on rates and revenue requirements over 20 years.

"Boulderites always have walked their own path," the city says on its website. "Paddled their own kayak. Marched to the their own music. And they're known for doing it skillfully. Why should it be any different with our electricity supply?"

While the city said it is committed to exploring ways to achieve what it calls "the electric utility of the future," it has also said there might be ways to do so short of creating its own utility – in the form of a new partnership with Xcel Energy.

"What we are looking to do is move beyond a 19th century approach to providing energy and create a forward-looking, innovative and consumer-friendly utility model that reduces our reliance on fossil fuels," Bailey said. "Xcel Energy has served us for decades, and in many ways, done an admirable job. It is possible they could help us meet our objectives. We would welcome their involvement in a meaningful, timely and transparent discussion."

Even if the City Council votes on April 16 to move forward with the pursuit of municipalization, there will be many steps still to come, "and off-ramps will remain available," the city said in its Feb. 26 report. —JEANNINE ANDERSON

Share this articleShare on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn

Testo, Inc.

The city of Oberlin, Ohio, plans to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by 100 percent by 2050, according to a Climate Action Plan the public power community completed in 2012.

The city devised the plan after beginning a membership with the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives in 2007. The city agreed to carry out five steps, the third of which was to develop the Climate Action Plan. But first, the city performed a greenhouse gas emissions inventory and set targets for reducing its emissions.

The inventory determined that the city emitted 174,391 tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent in 2007, about 20.9 tons per capita. About 67 percent of the emissions are estimated to come from municipal facilities while about 38 percent are estimated to come from the city’s commercial sector.

The city then set goals of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent of 2007 levels by 2015, by 75 percent by 2030 and by 100 percent by 2050. According to the Climate Action Plan, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change recommends an 80 percent reduction from 1990 greenhouse gas levels by 2050.

Oberlin’s Climate Action Plan project was supported by a $4,000 scholarship from APPA’s DEED (Demonstration of Energy & Efficiency Developments) program. Details of the research are published in the final report for the project, which is posted in the DEED Project Database.

A more detailed news story about the project appears in the winter issue of the DEED Digest. The DEED Project Database and DEED Digest newsletter are both available to all DEED-member APPA utilities.

Share this articleShare on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn

S&C Electric Company

APPA is soliciting suggestions for topics and speakers for The 2013 Customer Connections Conference.

The Customer Connections Conference, to be held Nov. 3-6 in Portland, Ore., offers informational sessions and roundtable discussions for public power utility professionals in the areas of:

•  Customer services
•  Economic development
•  Energy services
•  Key accounts
•  Public communications

To suggest topics or speakers for The Customer Connections Conference, please complete the online survey: http://www.publicpower.org/aboutappa/bftopicssurvey.cfm?ItemNumber=37002 or contact APPA’s Education Department at 202/467-2921 or EducationInfo@PublicPower.org.

The deadline to suggest topics or speakers for this conference is March 20. —MEGHAN RILEY

Share this articleShare on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn

Webinar – Safety: Accident Investigation and Near Misses
March 5

2013 Legislative Rally
Washington, D.C.
March 11-13

Webinar – Electric Utility 101: Transmission
March 18

Public Power Lineworkers Rodeo
Kissimmee, Fla.
March 22-23

57th Annual Engineering and Operations Technical Conference
Kissimmee, Fla.
March 24-27

2013 Supply Management Conference
Kissimmee, Fla.
March 25-27

Webinar – Utility Governance: Duties, Responsibilities and Legal Obligations of Public Power Governing Boards
March 28

Public Communications Spring Issues Roundtable 
Washington, D.C. 
April 5

Webinar – Utility Governance: Federal Legislative and Regulatory Issues for Boards
April 15

Webinar – Electric Utility 101: Distribution 
April 16

General Accounting, Finance & Audit Spring Meeting
Washington, D.C.
April 18-19

Webinar – Utility Governance: Strategic Issues Facing Public Power Governing Bodies
April 23

Spring Education Institute
Anaheim, Calif.
May 6-10

Webinar – Utility Governance: Overview of Utility Financial Operations for Board and Council Members
May 14

Webinar – Utility Governance: Rate Making for Utility Boards and City Councils
June 11

APPA National Conference & Public Power Expo
Nashville, Tenn.
June 14-19

Webinar – Utility Governance: Strategic Planning for Utility Boards and City Councils
July 16

Webinar – Utility Governance: Performance Monitoring and Accountability for Boards
September 17

APPA Business & Financial Conference
Orlando, Fla.
September 22-25

For a full APPA Events Calendar, visit Publicpower.org.

Share this articleShare on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn

Naylor, LLC

Executive directorPublic Generating Pool (PGP) is an unincorporated association composed of 10 consumer-owned electric generating utilities in Washington and Oregon that work together on issues of common interest. PGP is seeking an experienced full-time professional to act as executive director to actively advance member goals while working with a diverse group of leaders and rule makers. Activities will include, but are not limited to, identifying threats to member goals and priorities, coordinating PGP committee meetings and actions, tracking regional and national power industry issues, lobbying or influencing rulemaking and developing and maintaining key relationships with stakeholders and key decision makers. The deadline for submission is Friday, March 15. Contact Kathy Loveland for further information: 509/773-7606 or kloveland@klickpud.com.

Safety instructorNorth Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives, in Mandan, N.D., is hiring a safety instructor. Qualifications include: journeyman lineworker experience or background in safety and loss control. Competitive wages and benefits are included. Visit our website at www.ndarec.com for more details. Send your resume to Paul Davis at pdavis@ndarec.com or call 701/667-6423.

Check out APPA's career services on the Web

Visit the Career Center at PublicPower.org. Our career center allows job seekers to upload resumes, and recruiters to obtain resumes from job seekers. Classified ads in Public Power Daily and Public Power Weekly cost 70 cents per word for APPA members, and 80 cents per word for nonmembers, for a one-week run. Job posting subscriptions are available in packages of five, 10, or unlimited for a full year. The weekly deadline for placing a classified ad is every Thursday at 12 p.m. (Eastern time). If you have questions about classified ads, please write to jobs@publicpower.org, or call 202/467-2958.

Share this articleShare on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn

Hometown Connections International, LLC

eMeter Corporation


Meramec Electrical Products Co Inc

Naylor, LLC

Naylor, LLC

APPA Academy


2451 Crystal Dr.
Suite 1000
Arlington, VA 22202

Voice: 202/467-2900
Fax: 202/467-2910 www.PublicPower.org




Job classifieds:

Paul Ciampoli, News Director
Jeannine Anderson, News Editor
Laura D’Alessandro, Editor, Integrated Media & Communications

Copyright 2018, American Public Power Association.

Subscribers are prohibited from reproduction of this publication by any means, including facsimile or email transmission, without the express permission of the American Public Power Association, except that it may be reproduced and/or redistributed to employees or board members of their own organizations.

Copyright © 2018, American Public Power Association